Skip Navigation

Occupational Feminization and Pay: Assessing Causal Dynamics Using 1950–2000 U.S. Census Data

  1. Asaf Levanon
  1. Stanford University
  1. Direct correspondence to Asaf Levanon, Department of Sociology, 450 Serra Mall, Building 120, Room 160, Stanford, CA, 94305-2047. E-mail: levanon{at}stanford.edu.
  1. Paula England
  1. Stanford University
  1. Paul Allison
  1. University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

Occupations with a greater share of females pay less than those with a lower share, controlling for education and skill. This association is explained by two dominant views: devaluation and queuing. The former views the pay offered in an occupation to affect its female proportion, due to employers' preference for men—a gendered labor queue. The latter argues that the proportion of females in an occupation affects pay, owing to devaluation of work done by women. Only a few past studies used longitudinal data, which is needed to test the theories. We use fixed-effects models, thus controlling for stable characteristics of occupations, and U.S. Census data from 1950 through 2000. We find substantial evidence for the devaluation view, but only scant evidence for the queuing view.

| Table of Contents

Impact Factor: 1.736

5-Yr impact factor: 2.588

Editor-in-Chief

Arne L. Kalleberg


For Authors

Oxford Open RCUK Open Access

Looking for your next opportunity?

Looking for jobs...

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.